Close
Insights - July 15, 2025

Florida’s New Foreign-Donor Ban for Charities

What Senate Bill 700 Means for Nonprofits, Fundraisers, and Cause-Marketing Programs

By Alexander M. Parthemer, LL.M., Richard C. Vaughan, LL.M., and William G. Smith, LL.M.

Beginning July 1, 2025, every charity, foundation, social-welfare organization, professional fundraiser, and commercial co-venturer that asks Floridians for contributions must police its funding sources for any link—direct or indirect—to seven “foreign countries of concern.” Florida’s Senate Bill 700 (codified at Fla. Stat. §§ 496.401–.431) layers an unprecedented “foreign influence” screen onto the state’s long-standing charitable-solicitation regime. The statute also launches a publicly searchable “Honest Services Registry,” positioning compliant organizations for a reputational boost—and inviting scrutiny for those that remain off-list.

For nonprofits that raise funds nationwide, SB 700 is more than a local compliance tweak. It previews a broader state-level push to curb foreign influence in civil society and could quickly become a template elsewhere. 

Who Is Covered?

SB 700 sweeps broadly, catching:

  • Charitable organizations of every federal tax stripe—public charities, private foundations, 501(c)(4) social-welfare groups, even non-exempt nonprofits that raise philanthropic dollars.
  • Professional fundraisers, fundraising consultants, and commercial co-venturers (cause-marketing partners).
  • Foreign charities or multinational companies if they solicit Florida residents or have funds solicited on their behalf.

Exemptions that already exist under Chapter 496—e.g., member-only drives, religious institutions, or charities that raise less than $50,000 during its fiscal year exclusively through volunteers—remain, but they must be affirmatively claimed on a new Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (“FDACS”) form.

The Core Prohibition

No covered person may “solicit or accept contributions, funding, support, or services” from a “foreign source of concern.” There is no de minimis threshold, and the ban applies equally to direct gifts and indirect support funneled through intermediaries.

The Seven “Foreign Countries of Concern”

  1. People’s Republic of China
  2. Russian Federation
  3. Islamic Republic of Iran
  4. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea)
  5. Republic of Cuba
  6. Venezuelan regime of Nicolás Maduro
  7. Syrian Arab Republic

Who Counts as a “Foreign Source”?

  • The government, any official, political party, or party member of a listed country.
  • Any entity organized under, or chiefly doing business in, a listed country—plus its subsidiaries, agents, or affiliates.
  • Individuals domiciled in a listed country who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents.
  • Any person or entity “controlled” (≥ 25% voting or profit share) by one of the above.
  • Agents acting on behalf of any such source.

The 25% “controlling-interest” presumption reaches up the ownership chain, making grant-makers, donor-advised funds (“DAFs”), and corporate-social-responsibility programs potential conduits that charities must vet.

Attestation and the “Honest Services Registry”

Foreign-Donor Attestation

Every organization that files (or renews) a charitable-solicitation registration with FDACS must now include a sworn attestation, signed by an authorized officer, that it will not solicit or accept contributions from a foreign source of concern. The attestation becomes part of the organization’s public registration file and is subject to civil or criminal penalties if it proves false.

Honest Services Registry

SB 700 also directs FDACS to create, publish, and maintain an “Honest Services Registry” on its website. To appear on the Registry, a charity must file a separate board-authorized statement affirming that it does not solicit or accept foreign-linked support and is not influenced in its messaging or programming by a foreign source of concern. Participation is voluntary, but inclusion could become a de facto seal of approval for Florida donors. FDACS is charged with adopting rules that specify the enrollment process, renewal intervals, and grounds for removal.

Enforcement Architecture

  •  FDACS Investigations: FDACS enforces the donation ban and registry filings.
  • Florida Elections Commission Referrals: FDACS may refer suspected election-related violations to the Commission.
  • Civil & Criminal Penalties: Cease-and-desist orders, fines, suspension of solicitation rights, and criminal charges for knowing or willful breaches.

Safe Harbor for First-Time, Inadvertent Violations

A charity may escape penalties if, within 30 days of learning of the violation, it:

  1. Provides FDACS with the donor’s false certification that no foreign ties exist;
  2. Refunds the contribution in full; and
  3. Files a corrective plan with FDACS to prevent repeats.

The safe harbor is one-time-only and unavailable for willful conduct.

Practical Compliance Steps

Immediate Task

Audit current revenue streams—review current donors, grants, event sponsors, DAF agreements with donors, contributions received from DAFs, corporate partnerships.

Rationale

Pinpoint potential foreign exposure

Embed donor certifications on every gift pathway (online forms, pledge cards, DAF recommendations, grant agreements).

Provides the “false certification” proof needed for the safe harbor.

Upgrade due-diligence tools—add country-of-origin and 25% ownership questions to CRM; run name checks with Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Sanctions Lists or similar government lists.

Detect indirect or pass-through foreign control of donor.

Revise gift-acceptance and refund policies to include SB 700 definitions and 30-day refund mechanics.

Board must certify conflict-of-interest policy that addresses the new law.

Amend contracts with professional fundraisers, platforms, and co-venturers to require their compliance and flow-down certifications.

Liability follows the funds.

Board action: Adopt updated policies, authorize attestations, and delegate compliance oversight.

Statutory mandate; protects directors.

Train staff and volunteers—fundraisers, event teams, chapter leaders—on screening questions and red-flag response.

Reduces inadvertent violations.

Monitor FDACS rulemaking for the final attestation form and registry enrollment rules.

FDACS has not yet published updated forms; details may shift.

What In-House Counsel and Compliance Officers Should Do Now

  1. Create a cross-functional task force involving development, legal, finance, and IT to oversee SB 700 implementation.
  2. Draft a donor-certification template (see sample below) and push live across all platforms.
  3. Schedule a board resolution before the organization’s next FDACS filing deadline.
  4. Budget for screening software or third-party services—manual Google searches will not scale.
  5. Educate national and regional chapters and affiliates that Florida rules apply if they target or receive funds from Florida residents.

Sample Certification Language

Foreign-Source Certification (Florida SB 700)
I certify that neither I nor any entity I control is a “foreign source of concern” as defined in Fla. Stat. § 496.404, and that this contribution is not made on behalf of such a source. I further certify that no foreign source exercises 25% or more voting or profit control over any entity through which this contribution is made. I understand that misrepresentation may subject me to penalties under Florida law.”

Include an electronic signature box and a required checkbox; retain the record for at least three years.

Looking Ahead

Florida’s foreign-donor ban signals a rising tide of state activism at the intersection of national security and nonprofit regulation. Congressional leaders have already floated similar concepts at the federal level, and at least 17 other states are exploring foreign-influence limits in real estate, higher education, or charitable funding. The outcome of a pending Eleventh Circuit challenge to Florida’s 2023 foreign real-estate-ownership ban could determine how far states may go. Whether or not SB 700 survives potential constitutional challenge, its compliance architecture—attestations, public registries, safe-harbor refunds—offers a roadmap other legislatures can emulate.

For now, charities that rely on Sunshine-State generosity, or that simply process online gifts with a Florida ZIP code, must adapt quickly. With board attention, updated policies, and robust donor screening, compliance is achievable without derailing mission or development goals. Delay, by contrast, risks lost fundraising authority, reputational harm, and steep penalties.

Our team is assisting numerous nonprofit clients in redesigning solicitation materials and briefing their boards on fiduciary duties under SB 700. For further guidance on how these changes impact your nonprofit, contact your Jones Foster attorney.

The information provided in this article does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; it is for general informational purposes only. No reader of this article should act or refrain from acting on the basis of this information without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction to ensure the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.

About Jones Foster

Jones Foster is a full-service commercial and private client law firm headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida, with offices in Palm Beach and Jupiter. Tracing its roots back to 1924, the firm has served as an integral part of South Florida’s growth and prosperity. Through a relentless pursuit of excellence, Jones Foster delivers original legal solutions that help clients, colleagues, and the community to move forward. A significant number of attorneys have received the designation of Board-Certified Specialist by The Florida Bar in their specific practice area. The firm’s practice groups include Complex Litigation & Dispute Resolution; Corporate & Tax; Land Use & Governmental; Private Wealth, Wills, Trusts & Estates; Real Estate; and Trust & Estate Litigation. For more information, please visit www.jonesfoster.com.