The Florida Legislature recently passed the Florida Contracts Honoring Opportunity, Investment, Confidentiality, and Economic Growth (CHOICE) Act, which permits the use of garden leave agreements and places new requirements on noncompete agreements. Both provisions may be enforced through injunctive relief. However, the new law applies only to certain individuals, based on income. If signed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, the law will be effective July 1, 2025.
The proposed legislation applies to two categories of people and businesses:
The proposed law creates the addition of garden leave agreements as an available avenue to protect business interests. A “covered garden leave agreement” is a written agreement in which:
Under the bill, a covered garden leave agreement is fully enforceable according to its terms if it contains these provisions:
Florida law currently permits noncompete agreements, however, the new law would create sweeping changes in favor of the employer. The bill defines a “covered noncompete agreement” as a written contract between a covered employer and covered employee that limits the employee’s future employment for up to four years within a defined geographic area. Previously, a noncompete that exceeded a two-year duration was presumed unreasonable in Florida.
Also under the bill, employers will have more success in enforcing a noncompete since it eliminates the previous requirement that employers demonstrate a “legitimate business interest” justifying the restraint. Under the new law, a covered noncompete agreement is fully enforceable according to its terms if it contains these provisions:
For both proposed noncompete agreements and garden leave agreements, an employer must provide seven days’ notice before an offer of employment expires to give the employee time to review. A current employee must also be given seven days’ notice before the offer to enter into the agreement expires.
The CHOICE Act can be enforced by injunctive relief. Employers can seek to enjoin an employee from providing services to another business, entity, or individual. The burden then shifts to the employee to have the injunction either dissolved or modified. The employee must show that:
(1) The employee did not perform, during the noncompete period, any similar work to the services provided to the employer or use confidential information or customer relationships of the employer; and
(2) The employer failed to pay the salary benefits required under the garden leave provision during the notice period and had a reasonable opportunity to cure.
If the injunction is pursuant to a noncompete agreement, the employee must additionally show that the business, entity, or individual seeking to employ the employee is not planning to engage in similar activity as the previous employer and in the geographic area described in the agreement.
This new law would not replace the existing framework provided in Fla. Stat. § 542.18 but would be a supplementation. If an agreement fits within the new provisions, the new law would apply. However, if an agreement does not meet the requirements of the new law, the current statute would apply.
Florida’s CHOICE Act is a departure from the recent federal attempts toward curbing or outright banning noncompete agreements. While the Federal Trade Commission and other agencies pursue efforts to limit the use of restrictive covenants in the name of labor mobility and market competition, Florida is signaling a firm commitment to providing more certainty to employers seeking to enforce a noncompete agreement. Florida’s CHOICE Act positions Florida as a jurisdiction where employers can continue to rely on noncompete agreements as a legitimate tool for safeguarding business interests.
--
Jones Foster litigation shareholder Michael J. Gore, LL.M., concentrates his practice in the areas of employment, construction, and securities law and has significant experience handling a wide variety of complex litigation matters. Jones Foster attorney Dallas F. Dorosy is a member of the firm’s Complex Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice group and represents businesses and individuals in a wide range of commercial litigation matters.
This article originally appeared in the Best Lawyers® Corporate Law and Commercial Litigation Legal Guide on June 16, 2025. For additional information or questions regarding noncompete laws in Florida, we urge you to contact the authors of this article or a representative of Jones Foster here.
The information provided in this article does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; it is for general informational purposes only. No reader of this article should act or refrain from acting on the basis of this information without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction to ensure the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.
Jones Foster is a full-service commercial and private client law firm headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida, with offices in Palm Beach and Jupiter. Tracing its roots back to 1924, the firm has served as an integral part of South Florida’s growth and prosperity. Through a relentless pursuit of excellence, Jones Foster delivers original legal solutions that help clients, colleagues, and the community to move forward. A significant number of attorneys have received the designation of Board-Certified Specialist by The Florida Bar in their specific practice area. The firm’s practice groups include Complex Litigation & Dispute Resolution; Corporate & Tax; Land Use & Governmental; Private Wealth, Wills, Trusts & Estates; Real Estate; and Trust & Estate Litigation. For more information, please visit www.jonesfoster.com.